Monday, May 25, 2020
Trey Deitrick Mr. Hubert English language and Composition 23 February 2015 Steroids in Baseball The game of Baseball is an American pastime. During the late 19th century and early 20th century it was the most widely played sport in the country. Baseball back then was what video games and televisions is to us now. Throughout the years baseball has changed in some good ways and in some bad ways. The integrity of the game has been changed in a bad way by steroids. Steroids is what makes the game today so much different than it was back then. Of course steroids have been a controversy in this game for a long time but not to the extent it is right now in the late 90s , and 2000s. The punishments that they give right now for steroid use isÃ¢â¬ ¦show more contentÃ¢â¬ ¦Not only are these players, who use steroids and get caught , not able to play the game they love, but will lose out on a lot of money that they could be making during the games that they miss. Alex Rodriguez is a great example of financial punishment for steroid use. The suspension would be the lo ngest non-lifetime ban in Major league history and would cost Mr. Rodriguez more than 31 million in loss salary (Costa,Brian). The MLB has announced that it is going to enhance its testing policy and its punishments for using steroids or any other performance enhancing drugs. The enhanced testing procedure will include a lot more random in season tests. The number of urine tests will more than double. In the enhanced punishments there are at most three violations. A first time violation at the joint drug program will now result in an unpaid 80 game suspension, increased from 50 games.(Calcaterra,Craig). The second violation will result in an unpaid 162 game suspension rather than a 100 game. The third and final violation will result in a permanent suspension from baseball. Players want a fair and clean game, that is why they pushed for better testing and a lot more testing. The MLB commissioner, Bud Selig, was very pleased when the players pushed for stricter policies. Baseball has had its fair share of scandals. For example, baseballs first commissioner, Kennesaw Landis, was brought on to deal with the Black Sox scandal.
Thursday, May 14, 2020
Even though the answers to this inquiry might be debatable, this paper looks into some of the factors that might determine what might happen without religion in the modern era. For this reason, the paper will include an extensive literature review that is necessary for answering the research question. Individuals view religion as a belief system that affects their values, customs, laws, as well as their behavior patterns. These factors have an effect to individual people, groups or communities that they live in as well as an entire nation, and due to this, one might be able to argue that religion plays an integral or peripheral role in the society (Kevin et at, 2008). It is possible to see religion as a complex entity characteristic of organizational bureaucracy or it might be viewed as a simple relationship between an individual and an object or something that is a subject of worship. One of the key role of religion in a society is the explanation of the nature of life, explanation s of the primal origins of a given society, and the determination of the functions as well as aims of living. We will write a custom essay sample on The Fate Of Mankind Without Religion or any topic specifically for you Only $17.96 $11.86/page On this note, one might argue that without religion, it might be difficult to ensure a systematic and organized functioning of the society. Through religion, dictates on some of the acceptable standards that people in society must adhere to are determined. This means that people wishing to live by these dictates will remain in society and they should be able to ascertain that they adhere to the dictates. However, the regulations should be based on acceptable limits.
Wednesday, May 6, 2020
ShakespeareÃ¢â¬â¢s characters Hamlet and Laertes, in the play Hamlet, attempt to attain revenge for their fathers, but contrast in their approaches to achieving revenge, and their view of life as a whole, their failures revealing the inevitability of fate. Just as HamletÃ¢â¬â¢s inaction hinders him from achieving his goal of killing Claudius, LaertesÃ¢â¬â¢s impetuosity similarly leads him astray from his goal their inability to achieve these goals. The power of fate is thereby revealed through the futility of human actions due to the looming and palpable presence of human mortality. The downfall of each hero due to their respective Hamartias contrast to the outcomes of those who submit to fate, conveying the message of the inevitability of humanÃ¢â¬ ¦show more contentÃ¢â¬ ¦This regret and his indecision indicate that HamletÃ¢â¬â¢s true internal conflict was not with Claudius, but that was merely a manifestation of a deeper problem, that being a conflict with death, and its inevitability. HamletÃ¢â¬â¢s unhappy death reflects a lack of fulfillment during his lifetime showing the power of fate, as all his actions were not due to his own choices and did not bring him happiness. LaertesÃ¢â¬â¢ death is similar to Hamlet in this aspect despite his vastly different personality and actions. LaertesÃ¢â¬â¢s external conflict as established before is his conflict with Hamlet, who killed Polonius, his father. However, like Hamlet, this conflict remains after his death. Though he kills Hamlet he chooses to forgive Hamlet, begging him to Ã¢â¬Å"Exchange forgiveness with me, noble Hamlet./Mine and my fatherÃ¢â¬â¢s death come not upon theeÃ¢â¬ (Act 5 Scene 2 362,363). This shifts his external conflict to Claudius who he blames for his fatherÃ¢â¬â¢s death instead, but is unable to take revenge for his father due to his wounds in an ironic twist of fate, his believed free will results in him unable to fulfill his external purpose in life as his actions Ã¢â ¬Å"Hath turn d itself on meÃ¢â¬ (Act 5 Scene 2 348). Laertes too dies with regret as he is also unable to resolve his internal conflict which is his moral dilemma, desiring revenge but unsure of what costs he must pay to attain it. This conflict is notShow MoreRelatedHamlet And Laertes By William Shakespeare1265 Words Ã |Ã 6 PagesÃ¢â¬Å"Hamlet and LaertesÃ¢â¬ William Shakespeare s Hamlet is one of his excellent tragedies which explores the difference between themes such as love and revenge or the complexities of life and death. In Shakespeare s play, Hamlet and Laertes show some comparisons and contrasts which give an abundance of interest to the play. In fact, Hamlet and Laertes display impulsive reactions when angered; both have fathers killed, and both are seeking revenge. Even so, both characters display a considerable likenessRead MoreWilliam Shakespeare s Hamlet, Ophelia, Laertes And Laertes1308 Words Ã |Ã 6 PagesEra. In William ShakespeareÃ¢â¬â¢s Hamlet, Ophelia, HamletÃ¢â¬â¢s love and also the daughter of Polonius. She is a prime example of this as her father implores her to see Hamlet further more because of the possibility that he takes her name and her virginity. Ophelia truly loves Hamlet and was devastated when he shuns her in addition to pretending to be mad. She was affected by many of the decisions as well as the actions of the male characters in the play, including Hamlet, Polonius and Laertes. ThroughoutRead MoreHamlet vs Laertes in William ShakespeareÃ ´s Hamlet531 Words Ã |Ã 2 Pagesmost important themes of this play, the two avengers, Hamlet and Laertes have many similarities with one another. Although they both have difference ways of seeking revenge, they are found in similar situations making them two ideal characters to be compared. By making the two men so similar, Shakespeare intensifies the true character of Hamlet, making his differences from Laertes appear more clearly to the audience. The avengers Hamlet and Laertes both want to seek their fathers revenge, fight toRead MoreConflict Between Hamlet And Laerte By William Shakespeare1564 Words Ã |Ã 7 PagesThroughout Hamlet, several characters die. For most, this happens through combat, such as the duel between Hamlet and Laerte, which kills them both. In the play, however, two characters die in quick, seemingly careless ways. The first, the fair Ophelia, is killed by her own madness in what seems to be suicide. The other, Gertrude, dies due to the carelessness of her husband, who accidentally poisons her. In both of these cases, their deaths, and the events that led to them, represent a differenceRead MoreWilliam Shakespeare s Romeo And Juliet856 Words Ã |Ã 4 PagesWilliam Shakespeare is an American playwright and poet. He was born April 23, 1564 and died on the same day 52 years later on April 23, 1616. Throughout his life, he has accomplished many things. Some of his most famous works include but are not limited to Romeo and Juliet, Macbeth, and Hamlet. For one of his famous works, Hamlet, Shakespeare uses plot to strengthen the point of corruption in the play. Another element used to further help the theme of the play is character. The final literary elementRead MoreFriendship And Relationships In Hamlet919 Words Ã |Ã 4 Pagesreason to read a novel in school is not so much for the fun of reading, but for the lessons learned. William ShakespeareÃ¢â¬â¢s Hamlet, is not considered a classic without good reason. The play touches upon a wide variety of topics, teaching the reader a great deal about life. Shakespeare provides wonderful insight into everything from friendships to death. Of all the stories taught in British Literature, Hamlet is certainly the most important piece to keep due to the lessons in presents. It is definitelyRead MoreWilliam Shakespeare s Influence On The Course Of World History1440 Words Ã |Ã 6 PagesWaldo Emerson, a famous essayist inspired by ShakespeareÃ¢â¬â¢s works. William Shakespeare was a renowned author, poet, actor, and playwright. He has contributed to many components of life today such as; founding modern English language, contributing to literature, contributing to modern theater, and contributing many of his works to modern English. William Shakespeare has greatly impacted the course of world history. William Shakespeare was believed to be born on April 23,1564, in his hometown of Stratford-upon-AvonRead MoreThe Fatal Opposition Of Hamlet And Laertes1035 Words Ã |Ã 5 PagesOpposition of Hamlet and Laertes Newton s Third Law states that to every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction (Ã¢â¬Å"CentripetalÃ¢â¬ ). Many people have found this to not only be true in science but also in different situations, everyday life, and even in literature. In literature, when a character is equal but opposite to the protagonist, that character is called the foil. In the drama Hamlet by William Shakespeare, one character that is said to function as HamletÃ¢â¬â¢s foil is Laertes. Laertes is shownRead MoreEssay on Revenge in Hamlet912 Words Ã |Ã 4 PagesWilliam Shakespeare is considered the greatest writer of the English language. Shakespeare wrote hundreds of pieces, from sonnets to plays. Hamlet is one of his most well-known plays. There isnÃ¢â¬â¢t any shortage of revenge in Hamlet, and so that is the theme weÃ¢â¬â¢ll be discussing. Hamlet and Laertes are the most obvious character with revenge in their minds, and thatÃ¢â¬â¢s who weÃ¢â¬â¢ll be focusing on throughout the essay. Two months before the beginning of the play, the King Hamlet dies.Read MoreWilliam Shakespeare s Hamlet - Longing For Revenge1304 Words Ã |Ã 6 PagesLonging for Revenge William Shakespeare was born in England in April of 1564 and was an English poet and playwright . Shakespeare is universally known as the greatest writer in the English language. Shakespeare frequently produced tragedies that are continuously acted out today, along with many plays and sonnets.. Although Shakespeare is seen today as a great writer who changed the world, his reputation did not rise to these heights until around the 19th century. In all of ShakespeareÃ¢â¬â¢s astounding
Tuesday, May 5, 2020
The first chemical weapon, the second a biological, the third is classified as a radioactive weapon; and each of these weapons are capable of killing hundreds of thousands. So whats the difference between these different kinds of weapons? First, the chemical weapon of mass destruction. The chemical weapon has been around since the start of World War I. During World War I the U. S. created mustard gas, a gas that was tasteless, colorless, and odorless; but would cause giant blisters on the skin and lungs that would eventually enlarge until they took over the whole body and the person would die. Throughout the years the U. S. was able to concentrate the power of this chemical weapon and make them more precise. Now, small scale chemical weapons are used on a daily basis. We use tear gas for crowd control, laughing gas to knock someone out, and many different types of anesthesia and crowd control devices that are considered small scale chemical-weapons of mass destruction (WMD). The second type of weapon is a biological weapon. A biological weapon make use of many biological agents, including bacteria, viruses, and toxins. These different materials can now be concentrated and used to wipe out whole nations. In Israel and Africa biological weapons are used on a daily bases. People will take a dead or diseased animal and use it to foul up a well so that when people drink out of that well, they get sick, and it spreads throughout villages killing he all the villagers before it can be stopped. In todayÃ¢â¬â¢s society biological weapons are becoming less popular with the U. S. but more popular with other nations. Syria in the 20s were trying to isolate the virus small pox to conceal it into a weapon. It took them six years to finally develop the missile, but when they were finished they had enough small pox disease to wipe out the entire world twice over. The third classification of weapon is a radioactive weapon. Radioactive weapons were created in 1943 when a scientist was studying a chemical weapon. The scientist said that the chemical weapon gave off a deadly material that would destroy objects and render land useless unless the land is torn out and replaced with new soil. The scientist died before he could discover anymore. He died of radiation poisoning. The U. S. has drones that are constantly patrolling the air looking for anything suspicious and reporting it. The drones use lasers to help them take a picture with their thermal heat cameras that help us to find WMDÃ¢â¬â¢s. Most weapons can easily be detected, but the hardest one to detect is a biological weapon of mass destruction. Biological weapons are difficult to identify because they use microscopic bacteria. Lasers and ionization can now be used to automatically find the bacteria in a given sample. Analysis of the bacteria present can alert the inspector to the presence of common bioterrorism agents like anthrax. Handheld devices are carried by United Nations weapons inspectors. This brick-sized machine can analyze a sample and tell whether is contains deadly bacteria or not. This process used to take a whole lab of equipment. (Drones). As you can see, the U. S. has an extremely reliable detection services that can easily detect a WMD. We have x-rays, gamma imaging, drones, and powerful lasers that can detect the presence of a nuclear weapon that could kill millions. All in all the U. S. has created many different resources that could save millions of lives with teams ready to deploy on sight of a sighted WMD: constant aircrafts that are patrolling the skies, and very advanced technology that can search out any type of weapon; whether it be launched or is still being transported, we will find it. Although it is true that many other countries have successfully created weapons of mass destruction that could destroy the U. S. , this is the reason the war in Iraq started was because of nuclear weapons. However, other countries alone having weapons of mass destruction would not be enough to harm us because we are prepared. In conclusion, even though there are other countries with weapons that could destroy the U. S. , we are prepared enough that it would not pose a very big threat because it could easily be destroyed. Though many people believe that the U. S. is not ready to defend itself against weapons of mass destruction; there are many precautions in place including: missile targeting systems, patrolling aircrafts, and teams ready to deploy on sight of a WMD that has been fired. The U. S. has trained teams of military men and women trained to react in a situation involving a weapon of mass destruction. The military only accept the ones that are able to pass the test with one hundred percent accuracy. The men and women are ready any time and any day to react to the threat of a weapon of mass destruction. All over the United States there are Air Force units patrolling the sky and watching for anything out of the ordinary such as weapons of mass destruction. The pilots that are accepted into the U. S. Civil Air Patrol go through vigorous training to make them aware and ready to be thrown into action and have to adjust to a situation and solve a problem. They go through many challenging tests and advanced training to make sure that they can protect the American people. With all of the busy men and women in this country we need something that will never tire or fail to work. That is why missile targeting systems were created so they could keep a constant protective eye on the American people to keep them safe from any harm of a nuclear weapon.
Thursday, April 9, 2020
Animal Rights "It is possible to commit an immoral act against a non-human animals." In order to commit an immoral act against a non-human animal, one must define the word "morality". According to the definition it means conformity to the rules of right conduct,. On the other hand immorality means wickedness or evil (random house dictionary). So in reflection a wicked or an evil act against an animal is an immoral act also. I believe that it is possible to commit an immoral act against an animal because they are creatures just like us. They feel pain and emotions just like us humans. When someone violates our rights, we get hurt which often results in some kind of action. But animals are helpless, they can't take any action because they are less intelligent then humans. However I do believe that humans are the supreme beings on this planet and that we are on the highest evolutionary scale, but still that does not give us the right to commit wrong acts to the animals. Some of the wrong or immoral acts that I strongly oppose to are animal experimentation, entertainment involving animals, hunting and finally habitat destruction. Animal experimentation is unethical due to the suffering and death on animals in the laboratory and that they have a right to be free from such exploitation. Vivisection is the practice of experimenting on animals which started due to the religious prohibitions on human dissection. When religious leaders finally lifted these prohibitions, it was too late, vivisection was already entrenched in medical and educational institutions (internet). The author of the article on "animal experimentation is unethical" also opposes vivisection because he believes that is "morally wrong, cruel & fruitless." He also believes that they are characterized by scientific limitations, the most important of all the difficulty of transferring results to human beings with any degree of reliability (Bender 55). There are many reasons to oppose vivisection for example the enormous physiological variations among rats, rabbits, dogs, pigs, and human beings. An experiment in 1989 was performed to determine the carcinogenicity of fluoride proved this fact (internet). Approximately "520 rats and 520 mice were given daily doses of the mineral for 2 years." Not one mouse was adversely affected by the fluoride, but the rats experienced health problems . "As test data cannot be accurately transferred from a mouse to a rat, it cannot be argued that data transferred from either species to a human (internet). Some other reasons to oppose vivisection is the deliberate infliction of burns on animals, and research in psychology. In a study, guinea pigs were for 3 seconds in 100 degrees Celsius water (Bender 56). How would you feel if somebody immersed you for 1 second in hot boiling water? Would you feel any pain? In psychology research, countless animals have been "surgically dismembered, drugged, starved, fatigued, frozen, electrically shocked, infected, cross-bred, maddened, and killed in the belief that their behavior would shed light on human behavior (Bender 57). These things mentioned are morally wrong because they are evil in nature. As evil in nature as animal experimentation sounds, so is the entertainment business involving animals. I believe that animal circus is perhaps the most cruelest entertainment of all because the way animals are treated. I don't understand what kind of charm or fun people get out of watching animals do humanly acts. Why do we want animals to be more like us when they are perfectly fine being themselves? When we watch the circus, we only see what goes on in front of us, but what goes behind the scenes is a completely different story. Some animals are beaten to perform better, they are chained to iron poles so they won't run away. These animals are wild, and they need their space, and if they don't get their space, these animals react in a negative way. We often see on T.V. elephants running on the streets if kept under confinement because animals like elephants do have emotional feelings. Elephants also mourn for the dead and are observed to be around the dead for several days which proves that elephants have emotion. Other entertainment involving animals are also immoral such as bull fighting, hound racing and cock fights because it is unnecessary and causes much blood-shed to the animals (Disilvestro, 90) Another example of immoral behavior towards the animals which also causes blood-shed is hunting for pleasure and conservation. It is cruel and inhumane to kill animals for fun because they have pain, they have families. Many elephants are hunted down just so
Monday, March 9, 2020
Religion in schools essays Religion in schools is generally supported by the public, yet declined by the government. Documents 1, 2, 4, and 5 support religion in schools. Document 1 displays the first amendement, which supports the freedom of speech and religion. Document 2 contradicts the government's support for religion, as shown in document 1. From the point of view of a representative, the document points out that the government banned religion from our schools, yet he argues that we are still taught all of the bad things. Document 4 represents the public's opinion. The poll results showed that more than three fourths of the public was in favor of religion in our schools. Document 5 comes from the point of view of a regular teenage part of the public. She thinks religion should be permitted any and everywhere. Document 3 does not support religion in schools. This document is a controversy. Two sides had opposing views. The view against religion in schools won. A transcript of the trial would be helpful in determining the exact views of the opposing parties. Document 6 is neither supportive, nor against religion in schools. It merely explains the misunderstandings of the controversy (of religion). Its not that you cant pray in school, you just cant do it publicly. Documents 1 and 3 actually prove the effects of the government. In document 1, the First Amendment allows the freedom of religion and speech. That should allow religion to be practiced anywhere and anytime. In document 3, though, the Supreme Court rules against the First Amendment, basically. That is the ruling that doesnt allow religion to be practiced in schools. Religion in schools is generally supported by the public, but declined by our government. The government should allow it to be practiced due to the First Amendment, but does not allow it due to the Santa Fe vs. Doe ruling in 2000. ...
Saturday, February 22, 2020
Esaay 1 - Essay Example One of the justifications for this was parens patriae, meaning that the state has the right to intervene in the affairs of the child when they feel that the child is endangered or not being taken care of properly. One of the main guiding points is the environment in which the child has grown up in. Social learning theory and living with parents that do not nurture the child can lead to an increase in deviant behavior. Therefore, the child has not been taught how to act properly in society. This would then fall under parens patriae, in which the state would intervene and focus on the rehabilitation, not on punishment like the adult contemporaries. In addition keeping the children with positive role models through foster care can also help with their deviant behavior by taking them out of areas they associated with their bad life style, such as what they did in New York and Baltimore. One of the most important themes posed by Platt is the question of bringing juvenile crime into the sc ope of criminal law and the effect of nature vs nurture. This is a completely applicable question in todayÃ¢â¬â¢s judicial system. Some children are born with a conduct disorder which can lead to more severe deviant disorders during development.